Kentucky WRIS Portal
About Us
Loan Programs
Loan Calculator
WRIS
Internet Mapping
WRIS Portal
System Data
Project Profile Data
Cleaner Water Program Funding
SRF Project Funding
Area Water Management Planning Councils
Downloadable Reports
Water Management Coordinators
ADD GIS Staff
Legislation
& Regulations
WRIS Contact
Don Schierer
502-892-3486
E-mail
Working...
Clean Water Project Profile:
This profile is read-only (constructed or withdrawn).
Project Title:
US 60 West and KY 801 SSO Correction Project
Project Number:
SX21205037
AWMPC:
GWADD
Funding Status:
Fully Funded
Date Approved by AWMPC:
09.25.2018
Project Status:
Constructed
Primary County:
Rowan
Project Schedule:
Constructed
Planning Unit:
Rowan
E-ClearingHouse SAI:
KY201905070543
ECH Status:
Approved
Primary System:
KY0052752
Morehead Utility Plant Board
ADD WMC Contact:
Benjamin Hamm
Legal Applicant:
City of Morehead
Entity Type:
Incorporated City
Narrative
Applicant
Administration
Budget
& Schedule
Impacts
Components
Sustainable
Infrastructure
Audit
Project Title:
US 60 West and KY 801 SSO Correction Project
Project Description:
The project proposes capital improvements throughout sections of Morehead Utility Plant Board's (MUPB) collection system to correct capacity issues and sanitary sewer overflows (SSO). By installing new interceptors between lift stations and increasing the capacity and total dynamic head of several lift stations, the overall capacity in the area will increase and reduce the number of SSO events, the primary goal of this project. Force Main 5 – Salt Lick to Midland Approximately 7,900 LF of new 6” PVC force main will be installed from the Salt Lick Fire Station Lift Station (LS-48) to the Trailer Sales Lift Station (LS-46). The proposed 6” line will run in a northeasterly direction, parallel to the existing 4” line. All lift stations from the Salt Lick Fire Department (LS-48) to the Trailer Sales (LS-46) will connect to the proposed 6” line. The existing grinder services utilizing the 4-inch line will be moved to the proposed 6-inch line Force Main 2 – Midland to Leo’s Lift Station Approximately 13,000 LF of proposed 6” PVC force main will tie into the existing force main at the Trailer Sales Lift Station and run parallel to the existing 6” line to Leo’s Lift Station. A valve will be inserted on the existing 6” line to restrict flow, forcing flow into the proposed 6” line. Flow from all lift stations from Trailer Sales (LS-46) west and to Leo’s Lift Station will travel in the proposed 6” line. All existing grinder services will utilize the existing 6” line. The Trailer Sales Lift Station will be rehabbed to increase the flow capacity from 204 GPM to 300 GPM. The new pumps installed at the existing lift stations will have energy efficient VFD devices. Force Main 1 – Leo’s Lift Station to WWTP Approximately 13,600 LF of new 10” PVC force main will connect Leo’s Lift Station (LS-40) to the manhole located at the MUPB WWTP. The proposed 10” line will transmit flow from the west of Leo’s Lift Station to the plant. Flow from the Farmers School Lift Station and the Plumbing Supply Lift Station (east of Leo’s Lift Station) will connect into the proposed 10” force main. The existing 8” line will remain in service to transmit flow from 801 North to the interstate and 801 South. The existing Leo’s Lift Station will be demolished and a new lift station will be constructed on the adjacent property. The new lift station will increase the capacity from 550 GPM to 1,000 GPM. The lift station is being moved to an adjacent property because the existing site is not large enough for the proposed lift station. The Leo’s Lift Station rehab will include SCADA and energy efficient VFD devices. Force Main 3 – KY 801 North to Bullfork Road Approximately 31,250 LF of new 10” PVC force main will connect the Armory Lift Station (LS-14) to the MUPB WWTP. The new 10” PVC force main will run parallel to the existing 6” force main for 3,700 LF before deviating through the MMRC Industrial Park, running parallel to an existing waterline to Bullfork Road, crossing I64 under an overpass bridge (via approximately 500 LF of steel casing), and continuing down Bullfork Road before crossing Triplett Creek to the WWTP. Up to 20 new customers, and grinder pump stations, will be added on the new 10” force main line. The existing Family Dollar Lift Station will be replaced with a new lift station to increase the capacity from 78 GPM to 900 GPM and include SCADA and energy efficient VFD devices. Additionally, the Eagle Travel Plaza Lift Station and the River Edge Lift Station will be rehabbed by replacing the existing pumps and increasing the total dynamic head. The flow on KY 801 North will be split on the existing 6” force main by installing a valve near I-64. The flow will be diverted to a new 800 GPM Armory Lift Station and through the proposed 10” line to the WWTP. This will reduce the volume from KY 801 North into the existing force main at Leo’s Lift Station. Approximately 2,000 LF of 8" PVC gravity line will be installed from the existing 280 GPM Armory Lift Station to the proposed lift station. The existing Armory Lift Station will be eliminated.
Need For Project:
Briefly describe how this project promotes public health or achieves and/or maintains compliance with the Clean Water Act or Safe Drinking Water Act:
The project will improve and promote public health and environmental safety by eliminating SSO events in the US 60 West and KY 801 section of MUPB's collection system. MUPB began recording SSO events circa 1998. In 2000, MUPB was released from their Agreed Order with the Kentucky Division of Water. Since 1998, MUPB has recorded 396 SSO events throughout their collection system. 245 of the recorded 396 SSO events, approximately 62%, have occurred in the proposed capital improvement project area. Currently, the majority of the SSO events occur at the lift station wet wells in the proposed project area. However, the manholes found in lower elevation areas, such as Salt Lick, often overflow when the pump stations become backed up. Increasing the line capacity will alleviate the bottleneck and allow the lift stations to pump at their designed capacity, thus reducing SSO events. Force Main 5 – Salt Lick to Midland: 33 of the 396 system wide SSO events (approximately 8%) have occurred in the Salt Lick to Midland capital improvement project area. Force Main 2 – Midland to Leo’s Lift Station: 105 of the 396 system wide SSO events (approximately 26.5%) have occurred in the Midland to Leo’s Lift Station capital improvement project area. Force Main 3 – KY 801 North to Bullfork Road: 107 of the 396 system wide SSO events (approximately 27%) have occurred in the 801 capital improvement project area.
Project Alternatives:
Alternate A:
Note: If project includes the construction of a new treatment plant or upgrade to existing plant, please explain regionalization options here.
Alternate to Force Main 3 – KY 801 North to Moores Flat Road: The following proposed alternate has been added to the project description due to easement complications with the original scope of work: Force Main 3 – KY 801 North to Bullfork Road. Extend approximately 31,700 LF of 10" PVC force main that will connect the Armory Lift Station (LS-14) to the MUPB WWTP via Bullfork Road as opposed to Moores Flat Road. Total project cost estimate to include Bullfork Road route: $3,386,600.
Alternate B:
Complete the project in phases.
Entity Information
Entity Type:
Incorporated City
Entity Name:
City of Morehead
PSC Group ID:
Office EMail:
hsmith@morehead-ky.gov
Web URL:
Office Phone:
606-784-8505
Fax:
606-784-2216
Entity Address Information
Mail Address
Physical Address
Address Line 1:
314 Bridge St
Address Line 2:
City, State Zip:
Morehead
,
KY
40351
Entity Contact Information
Contact Type
Name
Title
EMail
Phone
Cell
Business Contact:
Helen Smith
City Clerk
hsmith@morehead-ky.gov
606-784-8505
Authorized Official:
Laura White-Brown
Mayor
mayor.white-brown@morehead-ky.gov
606-784-8505
Information Source:
Kentucky Department for Local Government
Date Last Modified:
04.25.2024
Project Administrator (PA) Information
Name:
Jocelyn R Gross
Title:
Director of Planning
Organization:
Gateway Area Development District
EMail:
jocelynr.gross@ky.gov
Phone:
606-780-0090
Fax:
Address Line 1:
110 Lake Park Dr
Address Line 2:
City, State Zip:
Morehead
,
KY
40351
Applicant Contact (AC) Information
Name:
Holly McGrath-Rosas
Title:
General Manager
Organization:
Morehead Utility Plant Board
EMail:
hrosas@mupb.com
Phone:
606-784-8313
Fax:
606-783-1340
Address Line 1:
135 S Wilson Ave
Address Line 2:
City, State Zip:
Morehead
,
KY
40351
Project Engineer (PE) Information
This project requires a licensed Professional Engineer.
A Professional Engineer has been procured for this project.
Licensed Engineer Information
License Number:
PE 25716
PE Name:
Matthew Ray Curtis
Firm Name:
Bluegrass Engineering, PLLC
Address Type:
Work
Address Line 1:
222 East Main Street, Suite 1
Address Line 2:
PO Box 1657
Address Line 3:
City, State Zip:
Georgetown
,
KY
40324
License Status:
Current
Disciplinary Actions:
No
Issue Date:
12.26.2007
Expiration Date:
06.30.2025
Phone:
502∙370∙6551
Fax:
EMail:
mcurtis@bluegrassengineering.net
Engineering Firm Information
Permit Number:
4499
Firm Name:
Bluegrass Engineering, PLLC
Phone:
502∙370∙6551
Fax:
Web URL:
http://www.bluegrassengineering.net/
E-Mail:
mcurtis@bluegrassengineering.net
Address Line 1:
222 East Main Street, Suite 1
Address Line 2:
PO Box 1657
City, State Zip:
Georgetown
,
KY
40324
Issue Date:
07.11.2017
Expir. Date:
12.31.2024
Permit
Status
Current
Disciplinary
Actions
No
Matthew Ray Curtis
Current
25,716
5,494
Estimated Budget
As-Bid Budget
Project Cost Categories
Cost Category
Cost
Administrative Expenses:
Legal Expenses:
$10,000
Land, Appraisals, Easements:
$11,140
Relocation Expense & Payments:
Planning:
$15,000
Engineering Fees - Design:
$210,240
Engineering Fees - Construction:
$39,420
Engineering Fees - Inspection:
$118,600
Engineering Fees - Other:
$20,600
Construction:
$3,715,855
Equipment:
Miscellaneous:
Contingencies:
$359,145
Total Project Cost:
$4,500,000
Construction Cost Categories
Cost Category
Cost
WWTP Secondary Portion:
WWTP Advanced Portion:
Inflow & Infiltration Correction:
Major Sewer Rehabilitation:
Collector Sewers:
$2,420,255
Interceptor Sewers, including Pump Stations:
$1,295,600
Combined Sewer Overflow Correction:
NPS Urban:
Non-Categorized Cost:
Total Construction Cost:
$3,715,855
Total Sustainability Costs:
$135,000
Note:
Sustainability costs are included within other costs
reported in this tab. This breakout, when provided,
is for SRF review purposes.
Project Funding Sources
Total Project Cost:
$4,500,000
Total Committed Funding:
$4,500,000
Funding Gap:
Fully Funded
Funding Source
Loan or
Grant ID
Fiscal
Year
Amount
Status
Applicable
Date
KIA SRF Fund A Loan (CW)
A19-032
2019
$3,650,000
Committed
03-07-2019
KIA SRF Fund A Loan (CW)
A19-032
2020
$850,000
Committed
01-09-2020
Total Committed
$4,500,000
Funding Source Notes
KIA Loan increased to $4,500,000 1/9/20
Estimated Project Schedule
Facility Plan Approval Date:
Estimated Environmental Review Submittal Date:
04.01.2019
Estimated Bid Date:
10.01.2019
Estimated Construction Start Date:
01.02.2020
Estimated Construction Completion Date:
10.01.2020
The following systems are beneficiaries of this project:
KY0052752
Morehead Utility Plant Board
Checked box indicates primary system for this project.
Project Ranking by AWMPC:
Regional Ranking(s):
Planning Unit Ranking:
Total Points:
 
Plans and Specifications:
Plans and specs have been sent to DOW.
Plans and specs have been reviewed by DOW.
Plans and specs have been sent to PSC.
Plans and specs have been reviewed by PSC.
Economic Impacts
Jobs Created:
Jobs Retained:
MHI Basis:
2025: ACS 2018-2022 5yr Estimates
2024: ACS 2017-2021 5yr Estimates
2023: ACS 2016-2020 5yr Estimates
2022: ACS 2015-2019 5yr Estimates
2021: ACS 2014-2018 5yr Estimates
2020: ACS 2013-2017 5yr Estimates
2019: ACS 2012-2016 5yr Estimates
2018: ACS 2011-2015 5yr Estimates
2017: ACS 2010-2014 5yr Estimates
2016: ACS 2009-2013 5yr Estimates
2015: ACS 2008-2012 5yr Estimates
2014: ACS 2007-2011 5yr Estimates
2013: ACS 2006-2010 5yr Estimates
2012: ACS 2005-2009 5yr Estimates
Demographic Impacts (GIS Census Overlay)
Serviceable
Demographic
Project
Area
Included
Systems
Included
Utilities
Population:
16,051
16,051
Households:
7,080
7,080
MHI:
$45,746
*
$45,746
MHI MOE:
$11,940
$11,940
MOE as Percent:
26%
26%
**NSRL:
2
2
Population and household counts are based on the 2020 Census DEC Redistricting Data (PL 94-171) dataset.
Median Household Income (MHI) Source:
American Community Survey 2018-2022 5 Yr Estimates (Table B19013
*(for the primary system operated by the above listed beneficiary utilities).
MHI MOE = Med HH Income Margin of Error.
** NSRL (Non-Standard Rate Levels):
0 = Greater than or equal to Kentucky MHI (KMHI).
1 = Between 80% KMHI and KMHI (exclusive).
2 = Less than or equal to 80% KMHI.
- KMHI =
$60,183
- 80% KMHI =
$48,146
New Customers
New Residential Customers:
61
New Commercial Customers:
New Institutional Customers:
1
New Industrial Customers:
New or Improved Service
Service Demographic
Survey
Based
Census
Overlay*
To Unserved Households:
20
To Underserved Households:
1,369
To Total Households:
1,389
**Cost Per Household:
$3,240
*
GIS Census block overlay figures are estimates of population and households potentially served by systems and projects based on a proximity analysis of relevant service lines to census block boundaries published for the 2010 SF1 dataset.
**
Cost per household is based on surveyed household counts, not GIS overlay values.
Geographic Impacts
For Project Area
Counties
Bath
Rowan
Legislative Districts
District Name
Legislator
House 074
David Hale
House 099
Richard White
Senate 27
Stephen West
Senate 28
Greg Elkins
Congressional 5
Hal Rogers
Groundwater
Sensitivity
Zones
2
HUC 10 Watersheds
HUC 10 Code
Watershed Name
0510010106
Triplett Creek
0510010108
Fox Creek-Licking River
Potential Impaired Watershed Designations
303d
305b
Priority
Watershed
Special
Use Waters
Exceptional
Use Waters
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Note:
Impaired Watershed Designations only indicate that mapped components for this project lie within a HUC-12 watershed boundary containing impaired waterbody features. An affirmative indication for any designation will require a detailed analysis of the project to determine if any of the proposed project components will actually have a positive impact on the relevant impaired features.
Geographic Impacts
For Included System(s)
Counties
Bath
Fleming
Rowan
Legislative Districts
District Name
House 072
Matthew Koch
House 074
David Hale
House 099
Richard White
Senate 27
Stephen West
Senate 28
Greg Elkins
Congressional 5
Hal Rogers
Congressional 6
Andy Barr
CW Specific Impacts:
Wastewater Volumes (MGD):
For this project:
For included system(s):
10.000
Reduced by this project:
Other CW Specific Impacts:
This project provides regionalization and/or consolidation of wastewater treatment systems.
This project will eliminate a package treatment plant that is more than 25 years old.
This project will eliminate a package treatment plant that has received notices of violations within the last two state fiscal years (July through June).
This project includes an on-site mound, and/or decentralized WW treatment system.
This project is necessary to achieve full or partial compliance with a court order, agreed order, or a judicial or administrative consent decree.
Primary system has not received any CWA Notices of Violation within the previous state fiscal year (July through June).
This project is consistent with the approved facility plan.
This project will have a positive impact on drinking water sources within a 5 mile radius.
Planning Needs:
Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Correction.
Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) Correction.
Replacement or Rehabilitation of Aging Infrastructure.
New Treatment Plant.
New Collector Sewers and Appurtenances.
Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems.
Upgrade to Advanced Treatment.
This project addresses PFAS or other emerging contaminants.
Rehab/Upgrade/Expansion of Existing Treatment Plant.
New Interceptor Sewers and Appurtenances.
Stormwater Control.
Non-Point Source (NPS) Pollution Control.
Recycled Water Distribution.
Planning
Other (specify):
Project Inventory (Mapped Features):
Point Features:
DOW
PermitID
Count
FeatureType
Purpose
Status
Existing
Capacity
Proposed
Capacity
Units
KY0052752
1
GRINDER PUMP
GRINDER PUMP INSTALLATION
NEW
EA
KY0052752
1
LIFTSTATION
ENERGY EFF - VFD DEVICE
REHAB
78.00
900.00
GPM
KY0052752
1
LIFTSTATION
ENERGY EFF - VFD DEVICE
REHAB
204.00
300.00
GPM
KY0052752
1
LIFTSTATION
ENERGY EFF - VFD DEVICE
REHAB
550.00
1,000.00
GPM
KY0052752
1
LIFTSTATION
INCREASE PUMP TOTAL DYNAMIC HEAD
REHAB
150.00
GPM
KY0052752
1
LIFTSTATION
INCREAST TOTAL DYNAMIC HEAD
REHAB
20.00
GPM
KY0052752
1
LIFTSTATION
LIFT STATION - SSO
ELIMINATE
280.00
GPM
KY0052752
1
LIFTSTATION
LIFT STATION - SSO
NEW
800.00
GPM
KY0052752
2
SCADA
ENERGY EFF - SCADA
NEW
EA
Linear Features:
DOW
Permit ID
Line Type
Purpose
Activity
Size
(in.)
Material
Length
(LF)
KY0052752
FORCE
COLLECTOR
EXTENSION
10.00
PVC
31,547
KY0052752
FORCE
INTERCEPTOR
REHAB - SSO
6.00
PVC
20,900
KY0052752
FORCE
INTERCEPTOR
REHAB - SSO
10.00
PVC
13,350
KY0052752
GRAVITY
INTERCEPTOR
REHAB - SSO
8.00
PVC
2,044
Total Length
67,841
Administrative Components:
The following administrative components are included in this project:
Planning
Sewer System Evaluation Survey Report
Design
Construction
Management
Audits on Record
Associated With Applicant
Audit
Year
Entity Name
Entity
Relationship
2022
Morehead, City of
Parent
2021
Morehead, City of
Parent
2020
Morehead, City of
Parent
2022
Morehead Utility Plant Board
Child
2021
Morehead Utility Plant Board
Child
2020
Morehead Utility Plant Board
Child
Water Treatment Plants Eliminated:
This project includes the elimination of water treatment plant(s).
Sanitary Sewer Components:
This project includes a new wastewater treatment plant.
This project includes an expansion of an existing wastewater treatment plant.
This project includes rehabilitation of an existing wastewater treatment plant.
This project includes upgrades to an existing wastewater treatment plant.
This project includes rehabilitation or replacement of aging infrastructure.
Total length of replaced infrastructure (LF):
36,294
This project includes new collector sewers.
Total length of new collector sewer (LF):
31,547
This project includes new interceptor sewers.
This project includes elimination of existing sewer system components.
Security Components:
This project includes cyber-security components.
Green
Infrastructure
Water
Efficiency
Energy
Efficiency
Environmentally
Innovative
Asset
Management
Green Infrastructure:
Green stormwater infrastructure includes a wide array of practices at multiple scales that manage wet weather and that maintains and restores natural hydrology by infiltrating, evapotranspiring and harvesting and using stormwater. On a regional scale, green infrastructure is the preservation and restoration of natural landscape features, such as forests, floodplains, and wetlands, coupled with policies such as infill and redevelopment that reduce overall imperviousness in a watershed. On the local scale, green infrastructure consists of site and neighborhood-specific practices, such as:
Component
Cost
Item 1:
Implementation of green streets.
Item 2:
Wet Weather management systems for parking areas.
Item 3:
Implementation of comprehensive urban forestry programs.
Item 4:
Stormwater harvesting and reuse.
Item 5:
Downspout disconnection.
Item 6:
Comprehensive retrofit programs designed to keep wet weather discharges out of sewer systems.
Item 7:
Establishment or restoration of riparian buffers, floodplains, wetlands or other natural features.
Item 8:
Management of wetlands.
Item 9:
Purchase of land or easements on land that has a direct benefit to water quality.
Total Cost:
* Indicates a business case may be required for this item.
If any box(es) above are checked, please describe each below.
Water Efficiency:
The use of improved technologies and practices to deliver equal or better services with less water. Water efficiency encompasses conservation and reuse efforts, as well as water loss reduction and prevention, to protect water resources for the future. Examples include:
Component
Cost
Item 1:
Installing or retrofitting water efficient devices such as plumbing fixtures and appliances (toilets, showerheads, urinals).
Item 2:
Installing any type of water meter in previously unmetered areas (can include backflow prevention if in conjunction with meter replacement).
Item 3:
Replacing existing broken/malfunctioning water meters with AMR or smart meters, meters with leak detection, backflow prevention
Item 4:
Retrofitting/Adding AMR capabilities or leak equipment to existing meters.
Item 5:
Developing water audit and conservation plans, which are reasonably expected to result in a capital project.
Item 6:
Recycling and water reuse projects that replace potable sources with non-potable sources (Gray water, condensate, and wastewater effluent reuse systems, extra treatment or distribution costs associated with water reuse).
Item 7:
Retrofit or replacement of existing landscape irrigation/agricultural systems to more efficient landscape/agricultural irrigation systems (rain and moisture sensing equipment)
Item 8:
Water meter replacement with traditional water meters.*
Item 9:
Projects that result from a water audit or water conservation plan.*
Item 10:
Storage tank replacement/rehabilitation to reduce water loss.*
Item 11:
New water efficient landscape/agricultural irrigation system, where there currently is not one.*
Total Cost:
* Indicates a business case may be required for this item.
If any box(es) above are checked, please describe each below.
Energy Efficiency:
Energy efficiency is the use of improved technologies and practices to reduce the energy consumption of water projects, use energy in a more efficient way, and/or produce/utilize renewable energy. Examples include:
Component
Cost
Item 1:
Renewable energy projects such as wind, solar, geothermal, and micro-hydroelectric, and biogas combined heat and power systems that provide power to a POTW.
Item 2:
POTW-owned renewable energy projects.
Item 3:
Collection system infiltration/inflow (I/I) detection equipment.
Item 4:
POTW energy management planning, including energy assessments, energy audits, optimization studies, and sub-metering of individual processes to determine high energy use areas
Item 5:
Projects that achieve a reduction in energy consumption (pumps, motors).*
Item 6:
Projects that cost effectively eliminate pumps or pumping stations.*
Item 7:
I/I correction projects that save energy from pumping and reduced treatment costs.*
Item 8:
I/I correction where excessive groundwater infiltration is contaminating the influent requiring otherwise unnecessary treatment processes.*
Item 9:
Replacing old motors with premium energy efficiency motors.*
$30,000
Item 10:
Upgrade of POTW lighting to energy efficient sources.*
Item 11:
SCADA systems where substantial energy savings can be demonstrated.*
$5,000
Item 12:
Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) controllers where substantial energy savings can be demonstrated.*
$100,000
Total Cost:
$135,000
* Indicates a business case may be required for this item.
If any box(es) above are checked, please describe each below.
Item 9: Three motors on two Lift Stations (Trailer Sales Lift Station - one motor; Salt Lick Fire Department Lift Station, two motors) will be replaced with premium energy efficient motors. Item 11: KY 801 North to Moores Flat Road section of the line will include a proposed 525 GPM MMRC Lift Station complete with SCADA to connect to MUPB’s existing system. Item 12: Two existing pumps at the Salt Lick Fire Department Lift Station will be replaced with more efficient pumps to meet the system head curve of the force main. The new pumps installed at the existing lift stations (Salt Lick Fire Department LS-48 and Trailer Sales LS-46) will be equipped with energy efficient VFD devices. The proposed MMRC Lift Station will be equipped with energy efficient VFD devices as well.
Environmentally Innovative Projects:
Environmentally innovative projects include those that demonstrate new and/or innovative approaches to delivering services or managing water resources in a more sustainable way. Examples include:
Component
Cost
Item 1:
Total integrated water resources management planning likely to result in a capital project.
Item 2:
Utility sustainability plan consistent with EPA’s sustainability policy.
Item 3:
Greenhouse gas inventory or mitigation plan and submission of a GHG inventory to a registry as long as it is being done for an SRF eligible facility.
Item 4:
Planning activities by a POTW to prepare for adaptation to the long-term effects of climate change and/or extreme weather.
Item 5:
Construction of US Building Council LEED certified buildings, or renovation of an existing building on POTW facilities.
Item 6:
Decentralized wastewater treatment solutions to existing deficient or failing onsite wastewater systems.
Item 7:
Constructed wetlands projects used for municipal wastewater treatment, polishing, and/or effluent disposal.*
Item 8:
Projects that result from total/integrated water resource management planning consistent with the decision criteria for environmentally innovative projects and that are CWSRF eligible.*
Item 9:
Projects that facilitate adaptation of POTWs to climate change identified by a carbon footprint assessment or climate adaption study.*
Item 10:
POTW upgrades or retrofits that remove phosphorus for beneficial use, such as biofuel production with algae.*
Item 11:
Projects that significantly reduce or eliminate the use of chemicals in wastewater treatment.*
Item 12:
Treatment technologies that significantly reduce the volume of residuals, generation of residuals, or lower the amount of chemicals in the residuals.*
Item 13:
Educational activities and demonstration projects for water or energy efficiency.*
Item 14:
Projects that achieve the goals/objectives of utility asset management plans.*
Item 15:
Sub-surface land application of effluent and other means for groundwater recharge, such as spray irrigation and overland flow.*
Total Cost:
* Indicates a business case may be required for this item.
If any box(es) above are checked, please describe each below.
Asset Management:
If a category is selected, the applicant must provide supporting documentation in PDF format to substantiate claims.
Asset Management Components
Last Rate Adjustment Date:
07.01.2023
Download Fee Schedule
Rate Adjustment Age (months):
6
System’s monthly water bill, based on 4,000 gallons, as a percentage of MHI:
1.06%
The system has an Asset Management Plan (AMP).
Note: AMP scoring credit requires at least one of the following components:
The AMP includes an Asset Inventory.
The AMP includes a Strategic Plan.
The AMP includes a Capital Improvement Plan.
Download Supporting Document
The system(s) involved in this project have specifically allocated funds for the rehabilitation and replacement of aging and deteriorating infrastructure.
Download Supporting Document
If any box(es) above are checked, please describe each below.
Morehead Utility Plant Board has a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) that is kept up-to-date internally. The attached CIP outlines projects, cost estimates, and schedules. Morehead Utility Plant Board allocates funds for the rehabilitation and replacement of aging and deteriorating infrastructure. The MUPB 2017 audit was uploaded as supporting documentation. Please refer to pages 16 and 17.
Activity
Date
Profile Created:
06.21.2017
Profile Last Modified:
12.20.2022
General Info Last Modified:
12.20.2022
Narrative Last Modified:
05.03.2019
Admin Info Last Modified:
08.27.2018
Budget Info Last Modified:
12.20.2019
Impacts Info Last Modified:
09.27.2018
Plans & Specs Info Last Modified:
Components Info Last Modified:
12.08.2017
GIS Last Modified:
04.10.2019
Deficiencies found in Sustainable Infrastructure Tab:
Asset Management Tab:
− The Capital Improvement Plan must have at least one of the required listed components.
Privacy
|
Security
|
Disclaimer
|
Accessibility Statement
Copyright ©
2024
Kentucky Infrastructure Authority