Kentucky WRIS Portal
About Us
Loan Programs
Loan Calculator
WRIS
Internet Mapping
WRIS Portal
System Data
Project Profile Data
Cleaner Water Program Funding
SRF Project Funding
Area Water Management Planning Councils
Downloadable Reports
Water Management Coordinators
ADD GIS Staff
Legislation
& Regulations
WRIS Contact
Don Schierer
502-892-3486
E-mail
Working...
Clean Water Project Profile:
This profile is read-only (constructed or withdrawn).
Project Title:
City of Burgin Sanitary Sewer Extension
Project Number:
SX21167012
AWMPC:
BGADD
Funding Status:
Over Funded
Date Approved by AWMPC:
07.20.2007
Project Status:
Constructed
Primary County:
Mercer
Project Schedule:
Constructed
Planning Unit:
Unit 4
E-ClearingHouse SAI:
KY201305010462
ECH Status:
Approved
Primary System:
KYP000080
Mercer County Sanitation District
ADD WMC Contact:
Karyn Leverenz
Legal Applicant:
Mercer County Sanitation District
Entity Type:
Sewer and Sanitation District
Narrative
Applicant
Administration
Budget
& Schedule
Impacts
Components
Sustainable
Infrastructure
Audit
Project Title:
City of Burgin Sanitary Sewer Extension
Project Description:
The project consists of new collection and conveyance system to serve the unsewered community of Burgin. Wastewater will be collected and transported to the existing Danville WWTP for treatment. Major project components include 55,000 feet of gravity collection sewer, 20,000 feet of force main and one major pumping stations. The project will serve approximately 479 residential customers that currently rely on failing septic systems for on-site disposal. The project will also eliminate two package treatment plants which currently serve the Burgin Public Schools and a local restaurant. The project will address a significant environmental and human concern with a direct impact on ground water.
Need For Project:
Briefly describe how this project promotes public health or achieves and/or maintains compliance with the Clean Water Act or Safe Drinking Water Act:
Providing sewers for Burgin will improve the condition of ground water and surface water in the region, thereby increasing the overall health of the area. This area is rated as having the highest level of groundwater sensitivity. Burgin is underlain by karst geology, therefore what goes into the ground through sink holes, cracks and crevices directly affects the quality of the ground water. This ground water surfaces into local streams and eventually into Herrington Lake. Herrington Lake is a designated drinking water supply source. Many of the septic systems in Burgin are failing or are getting to an age that they will soon fail. There are also two package treatment plants in the City that discharge to the creek. One of these plants has significant recent KDOW enforcement concerns and both plants will be eliminated by this project. Mercer County Health Department has confirmed the presence of e-coli in the Burgin area, likely from the failing septic systems or WWTP issues. Providing sewers will decommission septic tanks and package plants and help to remediate the e-coli found in the area and thereby improving the ground water and surface water in the region.
Project Alternatives:
Alternate A:
Note: If project includes the construction of a new treatment plant or upgrade to existing plant, please explain regionalization options here.
Construct a conventional gravity sewer system to collect wastewater from the Burgin area and convey it to Danville for treatment. Construct a central pump station and force main to convey wastewater to Danville for treatment. This is the recommended alternative.
Alternate B:
Construct a low pressure, small diameter force main with grinder pump stations to collect wastewater in the Burgin area. Construct a central pump station and force main to convey wastewater to Danville for treatment.
Entity Information
Entity Type:
Sewer and Sanitation District
Entity Name:
Mercer County Sanitation District
PSC Group ID:
Office EMail:
mike@lakevillagewater.org
Web URL:
Office Phone:
859-748-9654
Fax:
Entity Address Information
Mail Address
Physical Address
Address Line 1:
PO Box 303
801 Pleasant Hill Dr
Address Line 2:
City, State Zip:
Burgin
,
KY
40310
Burgin
,
KY
40310
Entity Contact Information
Contact Type
Name
Title
EMail
Phone
Cell
Business Contact:
Mike Sanford
Manager
mike@lakevillagewater.org
859-748-5642
Authorized Official:
James W. Dunn
Chairman
jamesd1965@hotmail.com
859-748-5642
Information Source:
Kentucky Infrastructure Authority
Date Last Modified:
03.24.2021
Project Administrator (PA) Information
Name:
Michael Davis
Title:
Engineer
Organization:
Strand Associates
EMail:
mike.davis@strand.com
Phone:
859-225-8500
Fax:
Address Line 1:
1525 Bull Lea Road
Address Line 2:
City, State Zip:
Lexington
,
KY
40511
Applicant Contact (AC) Information
Name:
Mike D Sanford
Title:
Manager
Organization:
Mercer County Sanitation District
EMail:
mike@lakevillagewater.org
Phone:
859-748-5642
Fax:
859-748-9114
Address Line 1:
PO Box 303
Address Line 2:
City, State Zip:
Burgin
,
KY
40310
Project Engineer (PE) Information
This project requires a licensed Professional Engineer.
A Professional Engineer has been procured for this project.
Licensed Engineer Information
License Number:
PE 15715
PE Name:
Michael Lee Davis
Firm Name:
Strand Associates, Incorporated
Address Type:
Work
Address Line 1:
651 Perimeter Drive
Address Line 2:
Suite 220
Address Line 3:
City, State Zip:
Lexington
,
KY
40503
License Status:
Current
Disciplinary Actions:
No
Issue Date:
02.03.1989
Expiration Date:
06.30.2025
Phone:
859∙225∙8500
Fax:
EMail:
mike.davis@strand.com
Engineering Firm Information
Permit Number:
663
Firm Name:
Strand Associates, Incorporated
Phone:
502∙583∙7020
Fax:
502∙583∙7020
Web URL:
http://www.strand.com/
E-Mail:
accounting@strand.com
Address Line 1:
910 W. Wingra Dr.
Address Line 2:
City, State Zip:
Madison
,
WI
53715
Issue Date:
11.02.1993
Expir. Date:
12.31.2024
Permit
Status
Current
Disciplinary
Actions
No
Michael Lee Davis
Current
15,715
2,411
Estimated Budget
As-Bid Budget
Project Cost Categories
Cost Category
Cost
Administrative Expenses:
$64,852
Legal Expenses:
$44,000
Land, Appraisals, Easements:
Relocation Expense & Payments:
Planning:
$5,000
Engineering Fees - Design:
$317,000
Engineering Fees - Construction:
$136,000
Engineering Fees - Inspection:
$222,000
Engineering Fees - Other:
$95,000
Construction:
$7,144,200
Equipment:
Miscellaneous:
$136,000
Contingencies:
$600,948
Total Project Cost:
$8,765,000
Construction Cost Categories
Cost Category
Cost
WWTP Secondary Portion:
WWTP Advanced Portion:
Inflow & Infiltration Correction:
Major Sewer Rehabilitation:
Collector Sewers:
$5,474,125
Interceptor Sewers, including Pump Stations:
$1,670,075
Combined Sewer Overflow Correction:
NPS Urban:
Non-Categorized Cost:
Total Construction Cost:
$7,144,200
Total Sustainability Costs:
$7,144,200
Note:
Sustainability costs are included within other costs
reported in this tab. This breakout, when provided,
is for SRF review purposes.
Project Funding Sources
Total Project Cost:
$8,765,000
Total Committed Funding:
$9,718,000
Funding Gap:
$953,000
(Over Funded)
Funding Source
Loan or
Grant ID
Fiscal
Year
Amount
Status
Applicable
Date
USDA RD Loan
$3,335,000
Committed
05-13-2014
USDA RD Loan
$538,000
Committed
05-03-2016
USDA RD Grant
$180,000
Committed
05-03-2016
USDA RD Grant
$3,925,000
Committed
05-13-2014
HB 265 Non-Coal Grant
13N-2012
2012
$740,000
Committed
07-26-2012
CDBG
13-041
2013
$1,000,000
Committed
04-02-2014
KIA SRF Fund A Loan (CW)
A15-005
2015
$1,740,000
Declined
07-11-2014
Total Committed
$9,718,000
Funding Source Notes
Estimated Project Schedule
Facility Plan Approval Date:
03.01.2013
Estimated Environmental Review Submittal Date:
Estimated Bid Date:
08.01.2014
Estimated Construction Start Date:
12.01.2014
Estimated Construction Completion Date:
The following systems are beneficiaries of this project:
KYP000080
Mercer County Sanitation District
Checked box indicates primary system for this project.
Project Ranking by AWMPC:
Regional Ranking(s):
Planning Unit Ranking:
Total Points:
 
Plans and Specifications:
Plans and specs have been sent to DOW.
Date:
06.22.2013
Plans and specs have been reviewed by DOW.
Date:
07.22.2013
Plans and specs have been sent to PSC.
Plans and specs have been reviewed by PSC.
Economic Impacts
Jobs Created:
Jobs Retained:
MHI Basis:
2025: ACS 2018-2022 5yr Estimates
2024: ACS 2017-2021 5yr Estimates
2023: ACS 2016-2020 5yr Estimates
2022: ACS 2015-2019 5yr Estimates
2021: ACS 2014-2018 5yr Estimates
2020: ACS 2013-2017 5yr Estimates
2019: ACS 2012-2016 5yr Estimates
2018: ACS 2011-2015 5yr Estimates
2017: ACS 2010-2014 5yr Estimates
2016: ACS 2009-2013 5yr Estimates
2015: ACS 2008-2012 5yr Estimates
2014: ACS 2007-2011 5yr Estimates
2013: ACS 2006-2010 5yr Estimates
2012: ACS 2005-2009 5yr Estimates
Demographic Impacts (GIS Census Overlay)
Serviceable
Demographic
Project
Area
Included
Systems
Included
Utilities
Population:
961
961
Households:
360
360
MHI:
$58,827
*
$58,827
MHI MOE:
$9,516
$9,516
MOE as Percent:
16%
16%
**NSRL:
1
1
Population and household counts are based on the 2020 Census DEC Redistricting Data (PL 94-171) dataset.
Median Household Income (MHI) Source:
American Community Survey 2018-2022 5 Yr Estimates (Table B19013
*(for the primary system operated by the above listed beneficiary utilities).
MHI MOE = Med HH Income Margin of Error.
** NSRL (Non-Standard Rate Levels):
0 = Greater than or equal to Kentucky MHI (KMHI).
1 = Between 80% KMHI and KMHI (exclusive).
2 = Less than or equal to 80% KMHI.
- KMHI =
$60,183
- 80% KMHI =
$48,146
New Customers
New Residential Customers:
New Commercial Customers:
New Institutional Customers:
New Industrial Customers:
New or Improved Service
Service Demographic
Survey
Based
Census
Overlay*
To Unserved Households:
500
To Underserved Households:
To Total Households:
500
**Cost Per Household:
$17,530
*
GIS Census block overlay figures are estimates of population and households potentially served by systems and projects based on a proximity analysis of relevant service lines to census block boundaries published for the 2010 SF1 dataset.
**
Cost per household is based on surveyed household counts, not GIS overlay values.
Geographic Impacts
For Project Area
Counties
Boyle
Mercer
Legislative Districts
District Name
Legislator
House 054
Daniel Elliott
House 055
Kim King
Senate 12
Amanda Mays Bledsoe
Congressional 1
James Comer
Congressional 6
Andy Barr
Groundwater
Sensitivity
Zones
5
HUC 10 Watersheds
HUC 10 Code
Watershed Name
0510020505
Lower Dix River
Potential Impaired Watershed Designations
303d
305b
Priority
Watershed
Special
Use Waters
Exceptional
Use Waters
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Note:
Impaired Watershed Designations only indicate that mapped components for this project lie within a HUC-12 watershed boundary containing impaired waterbody features. An affirmative indication for any designation will require a detailed analysis of the project to determine if any of the proposed project components will actually have a positive impact on the relevant impaired features.
Geographic Impacts
For Included System(s)
Counties
Boyle
Mercer
Legislative Districts
District Name
House 054
Daniel Elliott
House 055
Kim King
Senate 12
Amanda Mays Bledsoe
Congressional 1
James Comer
Congressional 6
Andy Barr
CW Specific Impacts:
Wastewater Volumes (MGD):
For this project:
0.100
For included system(s):
Reduced by this project:
Other CW Specific Impacts:
This project provides regionalization and/or consolidation of wastewater treatment systems.
This project will eliminate a package treatment plant that is more than 25 years old.
This project will eliminate a package treatment plant that has received notices of violations within the last two state fiscal years (July through June).
This project includes an on-site mound, and/or decentralized WW treatment system.
This project is necessary to achieve full or partial compliance with a court order, agreed order, or a judicial or administrative consent decree.
Primary system has not received any CWA Notices of Violation within the previous state fiscal year (July through June).
This project is consistent with the approved facility plan.
This project will have a positive impact on drinking water sources within a 5 mile radius.
Drinking water sources impacted by this project:
Herrington Lake
Planning Needs:
Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Correction.
Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) Correction.
Replacement or Rehabilitation of Aging Infrastructure.
New Treatment Plant.
New Collector Sewers and Appurtenances.
Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems.
Upgrade to Advanced Treatment.
This project addresses PFAS or other emerging contaminants.
Rehab/Upgrade/Expansion of Existing Treatment Plant.
New Interceptor Sewers and Appurtenances.
Stormwater Control.
Non-Point Source (NPS) Pollution Control.
Recycled Water Distribution.
Planning
Other (specify):
Project Inventory (Mapped Features):
Point Features:
DOW
PermitID
Count
FeatureType
Purpose
Status
Existing
Capacity
Proposed
Capacity
Units
KYP000080
1
LIFTSTATION
NEW
KYP000080
2
PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANT
ELIMINATE
0.01
MGD
Linear Features:
DOW
Permit ID
Line Type
Purpose
Activity
Size
(in.)
Material
Length
(LF)
KYP000080
GRAVITY
COLLECTOR
EXTENSION
8.00
PVC
54,943
KYP000080
FORCE
INTERCEPTOR
EXTENSION
12.00
PVC
20,366
Total Length
75,309
Administrative Components:
The following administrative components are included in this project:
Planning
Sewer System Evaluation Survey Report
Design
Construction
Management
Audits on Record
Associated With Applicant
Audit
Year
Entity Name
Entity
Relationship
2022
Mercer County Sanitation District
Parent
2021
Mercer County Sanitation District
Parent
2020
Mercer County Sanitation District
Parent
Water Treatment Plants Eliminated:
This project includes the elimination of water treatment plant(s).
Plants Eliminated By This Project:
DOW
Permit ID
Facility
Type
System Name
Design
Capacity
(MGD)
PFAS
Detected
KYP000080
PTP
Mercer County Sanitation District
0.010
No
Sanitary Sewer Components:
This project includes a new wastewater treatment plant.
This project includes an expansion of an existing wastewater treatment plant.
This project includes rehabilitation of an existing wastewater treatment plant.
This project includes upgrades to an existing wastewater treatment plant.
This project includes rehabilitation or replacement of aging infrastructure.
This project includes new collector sewers.
Total length of new collector sewer (LF):
54,943
This project includes new interceptor sewers.
Total length of new interceptor sewer (LF):
20,366
This project includes elimination of existing sewer system components.
Number of failing septic systems eliminated:
240
Number of non-failing septic systems eliminated:
239
Security Components:
This project includes cyber-security components.
Green
Infrastructure
Water
Efficiency
Energy
Efficiency
Environmentally
Innovative
Asset
Management
Green Infrastructure:
Green stormwater infrastructure includes a wide array of practices at multiple scales that manage wet weather and that maintains and restores natural hydrology by infiltrating, evapotranspiring and harvesting and using stormwater. On a regional scale, green infrastructure is the preservation and restoration of natural landscape features, such as forests, floodplains, and wetlands, coupled with policies such as infill and redevelopment that reduce overall imperviousness in a watershed. On the local scale, green infrastructure consists of site and neighborhood-specific practices, such as:
Component
Cost
Item 1:
Implementation of green streets.
Item 2:
Wet Weather management systems for parking areas.
Item 3:
Implementation of comprehensive urban forestry programs.
Item 4:
Stormwater harvesting and reuse.
Item 5:
Downspout disconnection.
Item 6:
Comprehensive retrofit programs designed to keep wet weather discharges out of sewer systems.
Item 7:
Establishment or restoration of riparian buffers, floodplains, wetlands or other natural features.
Item 8:
Management of wetlands.
Item 9:
Purchase of land or easements on land that has a direct benefit to water quality.
Total Cost:
* Indicates a business case may be required for this item.
If any box(es) above are checked, please describe each below.
Water Efficiency:
The use of improved technologies and practices to deliver equal or better services with less water. Water efficiency encompasses conservation and reuse efforts, as well as water loss reduction and prevention, to protect water resources for the future. Examples include:
Component
Cost
Item 1:
Installing or retrofitting water efficient devices such as plumbing fixtures and appliances (toilets, showerheads, urinals).
Item 2:
Installing any type of water meter in previously unmetered areas (can include backflow prevention if in conjunction with meter replacement).
Item 3:
Replacing existing broken/malfunctioning water meters with AMR or smart meters, meters with leak detection, backflow prevention
Item 4:
Retrofitting/Adding AMR capabilities or leak equipment to existing meters.
Item 5:
Developing water audit and conservation plans, which are reasonably expected to result in a capital project.
Item 6:
Recycling and water reuse projects that replace potable sources with non-potable sources (Gray water, condensate, and wastewater effluent reuse systems, extra treatment or distribution costs associated with water reuse).
Item 7:
Retrofit or replacement of existing landscape irrigation/agricultural systems to more efficient landscape/agricultural irrigation systems (rain and moisture sensing equipment)
Item 8:
Water meter replacement with traditional water meters.*
Item 9:
Projects that result from a water audit or water conservation plan.*
Item 10:
Storage tank replacement/rehabilitation to reduce water loss.*
Item 11:
New water efficient landscape/agricultural irrigation system, where there currently is not one.*
Total Cost:
* Indicates a business case may be required for this item.
If any box(es) above are checked, please describe each below.
Energy Efficiency:
Energy efficiency is the use of improved technologies and practices to reduce the energy consumption of water projects, use energy in a more efficient way, and/or produce/utilize renewable energy. Examples include:
Component
Cost
Item 1:
Renewable energy projects such as wind, solar, geothermal, and micro-hydroelectric, and biogas combined heat and power systems that provide power to a POTW.
Item 2:
POTW-owned renewable energy projects.
Item 3:
Collection system infiltration/inflow (I/I) detection equipment.
Item 4:
POTW energy management planning, including energy assessments, energy audits, optimization studies, and sub-metering of individual processes to determine high energy use areas
Item 5:
Projects that achieve a reduction in energy consumption (pumps, motors).*
Item 6:
Projects that cost effectively eliminate pumps or pumping stations.*
Item 7:
I/I correction projects that save energy from pumping and reduced treatment costs.*
Item 8:
I/I correction where excessive groundwater infiltration is contaminating the influent requiring otherwise unnecessary treatment processes.*
Item 9:
Replacing old motors with premium energy efficiency motors.*
Item 10:
Upgrade of POTW lighting to energy efficient sources.*
Item 11:
SCADA systems where substantial energy savings can be demonstrated.*
Item 12:
Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) controllers where substantial energy savings can be demonstrated.*
Total Cost:
* Indicates a business case may be required for this item.
If any box(es) above are checked, please describe each below.
Environmentally Innovative Projects:
Environmentally innovative projects include those that demonstrate new and/or innovative approaches to delivering services or managing water resources in a more sustainable way. Examples include:
Component
Cost
Item 1:
Total integrated water resources management planning likely to result in a capital project.
Item 2:
Utility sustainability plan consistent with EPA’s sustainability policy.
Item 3:
Greenhouse gas inventory or mitigation plan and submission of a GHG inventory to a registry as long as it is being done for an SRF eligible facility.
Item 4:
Planning activities by a POTW to prepare for adaptation to the long-term effects of climate change and/or extreme weather.
Item 5:
Construction of US Building Council LEED certified buildings, or renovation of an existing building on POTW facilities.
Item 6:
Decentralized wastewater treatment solutions to existing deficient or failing onsite wastewater systems.
Item 7:
Constructed wetlands projects used for municipal wastewater treatment, polishing, and/or effluent disposal.*
Item 8:
Projects that result from total/integrated water resource management planning consistent with the decision criteria for environmentally innovative projects and that are CWSRF eligible.*
Item 9:
Projects that facilitate adaptation of POTWs to climate change identified by a carbon footprint assessment or climate adaption study.*
Item 10:
POTW upgrades or retrofits that remove phosphorus for beneficial use, such as biofuel production with algae.*
Item 11:
Projects that significantly reduce or eliminate the use of chemicals in wastewater treatment.*
Item 12:
Treatment technologies that significantly reduce the volume of residuals, generation of residuals, or lower the amount of chemicals in the residuals.*
Item 13:
Educational activities and demonstration projects for water or energy efficiency.*
Item 14:
Projects that achieve the goals/objectives of utility asset management plans.*
$7,144,200
Item 15:
Sub-surface land application of effluent and other means for groundwater recharge, such as spray irrigation and overland flow.*
Total Cost:
$7,144,200
* Indicates a business case may be required for this item.
If any box(es) above are checked, please describe each below.
Project satisfies a desired project as listed in the utility's asset management plan.
Asset Management:
If a category is selected, the applicant must provide supporting documentation in PDF format to substantiate claims.
Asset Management Components
Last Rate Adjustment Date:
01.03.2023
Download Fee Schedule
Rate Adjustment Age (months):
12
System’s monthly water bill, based on 4,000 gallons, as a percentage of MHI:
1.38%
The system has an Asset Management Plan (AMP).
The system(s) involved in this project have specifically allocated funds for the rehabilitation and replacement of aging and deteriorating infrastructure.
Download Supporting Document
If any box(es) above are checked, please describe each below.
Rates for the City of Burgin maybe found at the following link and are updated annually when the Bluegrass Area Development District updates its annual rate book. http://www.bgadd.org/pdf/2012Ratebook.pdf This system has specifically allocated funds for the rehabilitation and replacement of aging and deteriorating infrastructure. Once proof of the reserve account has been provided the to Bluegrass ADD it will be forwarded onto KIA and DOW. Under "Assets", account 10015, Reserve Account, is funded monthly for repairs and unforeseen expenses.
Activity
Date
Profile Created:
06.12.2007
Profile Last Modified:
11.06.2018
General Info Last Modified:
11.06.2018
Narrative Last Modified:
12.20.2013
Admin Info Last Modified:
10.16.2013
Budget Info Last Modified:
11.05.2013
Impacts Info Last Modified:
11.17.2011
Plans & Specs Info Last Modified:
11.05.2013
Components Info Last Modified:
10.04.2010
GIS Last Modified:
03.21.2013
Deficiencies found in Budget and Schedule Tab:
Funding Sources:
− Warning: The construction start date is not within the normal expected threshold for projects requesting SRF funding.
Detailed Schedule:
− Warning: Estimated construction start date is not within 120 days after estimated bid date.
Privacy
|
Security
|
Disclaimer
|
Accessibility Statement
Copyright ©
2024
Kentucky Infrastructure Authority