WRIS KY0220555

Downloadable Documents

Note:

Tariff documents apply to the owner entity of this system and may not reflect sales summarized in the Fiscal Attributes tab presented on this page.

Download PSC Audit Report Document

Download PSC Annual Report (UFR) Document

Download Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) for year

Primary Facility Information
This is a treatment facility. This is a maintenance facility.
Facility Name:	Rattlesnake Ridge Water District Treatment Plant
Facility Contact:	Lester Bowling
Facility Phone:	606∙738∙6644
Facility Addr1:	52 Horton Flats Rd
Facility Addr2:
Facility City, State Zip:	Olive Hill , KY 41164
Date Last Modified:	04.28.2015

System Management Entity Information
Entity Name:	Rattlesnake Ridge Water District
Office Phone:	606∙474∙7570 Fax: 606∙474∙8531
Office Address 1:	5302 South HWY 7
Office Address 2:
Office City, State Zip:	Grayson , KY 41143

System Management Contact Information
Contact Type	Contact Name	Title	EMail
¹Operations Contact:	David Gifford	Manager	rrwdwc@yahoo.com
²Business Contact:	Becky Kitchen	Assistant Manager	rrwdwc@yahoo.com
Manager:	David Gifford	Manager	rrwdwc@yahoo.com

¹ Person responsible for physical infrastructure operations.

² Person responsible for billing and financial operations.

Date System Management Last Modified: 01.30.2024

Entity Information
Entity Type:	Water District (KRS 74)
Entity Name:	Rattlesnake Ridge Water District
PSC Group ID:	28600
Office EMail:	rrwdwc@yahoo.com
Web URL:	rrwdwater.org
Office Phone:	606-474-7570	Fax:	606-474-8531

Entity Address Information
	Mail Address	Physical Address
Address Line 1:	PO Box 475	5302 S Hwy 7
Address Line 2:
City, State Zip:	Grayson , KY 41143

Entity Contact Information
Contact Type	Name	Title	EMail	Phone	Cell
Business Contact:	David Gifford	Manager	gifforddavida@yahoo.com	606-316-1142
Authorized Official:	Bill Gilbert	Chairman	rrwdwc@yahoo.com	606-316-1277

Information Source:	Kentucky Infrastructure Authority
Date Last Modified:	01.30.2024

System Statistics
Date Established:		11.21.1983
Employees:		16
Does this system:
(a)	Produce water?	Yes
(b)	Have wholesale customers?	Yes
(c)	Purchase water?	Yes
What is the cost per 4,000 gallons of finished water for:
(a)	Municipal system, customers within the municipality:
(b)	Municipal system, customers outside the municipality:
(c)	Non-municipal system, all customers:	$66.26
Date of Last Rate Adjustment:		02.17.2023

System Demographics

Demographic Type	Population	Households
Directly Serviceable:	9,920	4,679
Indirectly Serviceable:	28,474	12,375
Total Serviceable:	38,394	17,054

Counties directly serviceable by this system: 5

MHI Basis:

County Name	Service Connections	Serviceable Population	Serviceable Households	Med HH Income	MHI MOE
Carter	2,591	5,985	2,788	$ 57,882	$ 14,329
Elliott	1,056	2,540	1,176	$ 49,364	$ 15,495
Lawrence	406	1,161	614	$ 43,025	$ 9,683
Lewis		132	57	$ 40,200	$ 8,361
Morgan	20	102	44	$ 45,241	$ 8,514
Totals / Weighted Average	4,073	9,920	4,679	$ 53,433	$ 13,883

Population and household counts are based on a proximity analysis of relevant service lines to census block boundaries published for the 2020 Census DEC Redistricting Data (PL 94-171) dataset.

Med HH Income (MHI) Source is from the American Community Survey 2019-2023 5 Yr Estimates (Table B19013) for the service area of this system.

MHI MOE = Med HH Income Margin of Error.

Comments:

Sandy Hook Volumes Updated as of 5/28/24
City of Olive Hill Purchases 1,386,620 + 2,330,000
City of Grayson Purchases 302,620
Big Sandy Purchases 820,600

Date Last Modified: 05.28.2024

Providers that sell water to this system:

Seller DOW Permit ID	Seller Name	Water Type	Ann. Vol. (MG)	Cost		Interconnects
Seller DOW Permit ID	Seller Name	Water Type	Ann. Vol. (MG)	Raw	Fin	Perm	Seas	Emer
KY0220164	Grayson Utility Commission	F			$4.30	2	0	0
	Totals and Weighted Averages					2	0	0

Providers that purchase water from this system:

Purchaser DOW Permit ID	Purchaser Name	Water Type	Ann. Vol. (MG)	Cost		Interconnects			Serviceable
Purchaser DOW Permit ID	Purchaser Name	Water Type	Ann. Vol. (MG)	Raw	Fin	Perm	Seas	Emer	Population	Households	MHI
KY0100944	Big Sandy Water District	F	7.078		$3.82	0	0	1	13,506	6,087
KY0220164	Grayson Utility Commission	F			$4.30	0	0	0	10,995	4,846
KY0320383	Sandy Hook Water District	F	2.552		$2.90	0	0	1	3,973	1,442
	Totals and Weighted Averages		9.630		$3.58	0	0	2	28,474	12,375	$0

− MG = Million Gallons
− Water Types: R = Raw Water, F = Finished Water, B = Both Raw and Finished Water
− Cost Categories: Raw = Raw Untreated Water, Fin = Finished Treated Water
− Raw and Finished costs are per 1,000 gallons.
− Interconnect Types: Perm = Permanent, Seas = Seasonal, Emer = Emergency

Water Treatment Plants:

Facility Name	Design Capacity (MGD)	Ave. Daily Prod. (MGD)	High Daily Prod. (MGD)
RATTLESNAKE RIDGE WTP	2.400	1.300	2.060
Totals	2.400	1.300	2.060

Production Statistics:

	WRIS	SDWIS MOR
Total Annual Vol. Produced (MG):	626.990	584.920
Total Annual Vol. Purchased (MG):		0.597
Total Annual Vol. Provided (MG):	626.990	585.517
Estimated Annual Water Loss:	49%	45%

Customers and Usage:

Customer Type	Cust. Count	WRIS Usage (MG)	SDWIS MOR Usage (MG)
Wholesale:	3	9.630	12.004
Residential:	4,322	287.315
Commercial:	12	22.963
Institutional:	2
Industrial:
Other:
Total Customers:	4,339
Flushing, Maint. & Fire Protection:
Total Water Usage:		319.908

Water Supply Info and Comments:

Water supply inadequacies during normal operating conditions:

none

Water supply inadequacies during drought operating conditions:

None

Planning Comments:

As of 1/30/2024, 750 service lines have been replaced. Water Loss is likely much lower. Meters have been replaced as well.

Date System Planning Info Last Modified: 01.30.2024

WMC Site Visit - Survey Information
Site Visit / Survey Date:	01.29.2024
Survey Admin:	Jasper Ball
Principal Respondent:	David Gifford
Other Respondent(s):

Survey Comments:

Date Survey Info Last Modified: 01.30.2024

Water
LinesWater
TanksPump
StationsTreatment
Plants

Assessment Area:

Size
(inches)

Material

Decade
Constructed

Length
(LF)

Condition
Code

Performance
Code

Priority
Code

Project Profile

Up to 2	PVC	1990	8,768
3	PVC	1990	19,255
3	PVC	2000	25,131
4	PVC	1990	23,802
4	PVC	2000	8,599
4	PVC	2010	11,992

Total length for assessment area:	97,547 LF
Total length for entire system:	2,412,898 LF

Condition Codes

1	New or Excellent - None or minor defects.
2	Good - Defects that have not begun to deteriorate.
3	Fair - Moderate defects that will continue to deteriorate.
4	Poor - Severe defects that will collapse/break in near future.
5	Inoperable - Defects need immediate attention.

Performance Codes

1	Exceeds/Meets all performance targets.
2	Minor performance deficiencies.
3	Considerable performance deficiencies.
4	Major performance deficiencies.
5	Fails to meet performance targets.

Priority Codes

0	Not a priority
1	It would be nice to have.
2	Improved system operations & maintenance (O&M) efficiency.
3	Internal safety concern or public nuisance.
4	Potential public health, safety, or environmental concern.
5	Existing threat to public health, safety, or environment.

Assessment Area:

Asset Name

Capacity
(gal)

Date
Constructed

Date
Inspected

Condition
Code

Performance
Code

Priority
Code

Project Profile

AULT	50,000	1/1/1992	5/13/1998
DIAMOND RIDGE	54,000	1/1/1995	8/1/2004
GREGORYVILLE #1	60,000	1/1/1985	6/1/2014
GREGORYVILLE #2	60,000	9/1/2001	6/1/2014
ISONVILLE	100,000	1/1/2007	10/20/2000
MAUK RIDGE	86,000	1/1/1989	5/13/1998
MAYHEW FLATS	262,000	1/1/1985	10/21/1997
MCCONNELL BRANCH	97,000	1/1/1985	10/20/1997
OAKLAND RIDGE	102,000	1/1/1996	7/1/2017
RATTLESNAKE RIDGE	500,000	11/1/2013
ROUTE 7	75,000	1/1/1995	11/18/1999
ROUTE 7 TANK 2	500,000	4/1/2001	8/1/2004
WALNUT GROVE	100,000	4/1/2001	7/1/2017

Condition Codes

1	New or Excellent - None or minor defects.
2	Good - Defects that have not begun to deteriorate.
3	Fair - Moderate defects that will continue to deteriorate.
4	Poor - Severe defects that will collapse/break in near future.
5	Inoperable - Defects need immediate attention.

Performance Codes

1	Exceeds/Meets all performance targets.
2	Minor performance deficiencies.
3	Considerable performance deficiencies.
4	Major performance deficiencies.
5	Fails to meet performance targets.

Priority Codes

0	Not a priority
1	It would be nice to have.
2	Improved system operations & maintenance (O&M) efficiency.
3	Internal safety concern or public nuisance.
4	Potential public health, safety, or environmental concern.
5	Existing threat to public health, safety, or environment.

Assessment Area:

Asset Name

Pump
Count

Condition
Code

Performance
Code

Priority
Code

Project Profile

CLIFTY CREEK	2
DIAMOND RIDGE	2
RATTLESNAKE RIDGE	2
ROUTE 486	2
ROUTE 504	2
ROUTE 986	2
SMOKEY CREEK	2
US 60	2

Condition Codes

1	New or Excellent - None or minor defects.
2	Good - Defects that have not begun to deteriorate.
3	Fair - Moderate defects that will continue to deteriorate.
4	Poor - Severe defects that will collapse/break in near future.
5	Inoperable - Defects need immediate attention.

Performance Codes

1	Exceeds/Meets all performance targets.
2	Minor performance deficiencies.
3	Considerable performance deficiencies.
4	Major performance deficiencies.
5	Fails to meet performance targets.

Priority Codes

0	Not a priority
1	It would be nice to have.
2	Improved system operations & maintenance (O&M) efficiency.
3	Internal safety concern or public nuisance.
4	Potential public health, safety, or environmental concern.
5	Existing threat to public health, safety, or environment.

RATTLESNAKE RIDGE WTP

Design
Capacity
(MGD)

Date
Constructed

Major
Expansion
Date

Condition
Code

Performance
Code

Priority
Code

Project
Profile

04-01-2002

09-01-2004

Note: There are no rated components associated with this treatment plant.

Condition Codes

1	New or Excellent - None or minor defects.
2	Good - Defects that have not begun to deteriorate.
3	Fair - Moderate defects that will continue to deteriorate.
4	Poor - Severe defects that will collapse/break in near future.
5	Inoperable - Defects need immediate attention.

Performance Codes

1	Exceeds/Meets all performance targets.
2	Minor performance deficiencies.
3	Considerable performance deficiencies.
4	Major performance deficiencies.
5	Fails to meet performance targets.

Priority Codes

0	Not a priority
1	It would be nice to have.
2	Improved system operations & maintenance (O&M) efficiency.
3	Internal safety concern or public nuisance.
4	Potential public health, safety, or environmental concern.
5	Existing threat to public health, safety, or environment.

The management of this system participates in an Area Water Management Planning Council (AWMPC).

The management of this system participates in regular training activities.

System operator(s) participate in regular training activities.

This system has an asset management plan.

Date asset management plan last updated:

07.01.2014

This system has a capital improvement plan.

Date capital improvement plan last updated:

07.01.2014

This system has GIS capabilities.

This system has a policy manual in place containing the following items:
Personnel Policies	Standard Operating Procedures
Line Maintenance Program	Meter Testing Program
Routine Pressure Checks	Pump Station Maintenance Schedule
Emergency Operation Procedures	Backup Sources of Water
A Water Shortage Plan	A Water Conservation Plan
Date policy manual last updated: 07.01.2014

Date of last DOW Sanitary Survey: Month: 4 , Year: 2014

This system has periodic service outages.

This system has periodic pump failures.

Cause(s):

Power failure

This system has periodic line breaks.

The following components are associated with periodic line breaks:
Typical line size(s):	4.00
Typical line location(s):	Varies all line sizes are affected
Typical cause(s):	Pipe failure
Other cause(s):	None
Est. water loss percentage:	6%

This system has localized problems.

The following components are associated with localized problems:
Problem location(s):	Elliott County pressure problems
Problem diameter(s):	4 & 3 inch lines
Problem material(s):	PVC
Problem pressure(s):	Yes
Problem cause(s):
Other problem characteristic(s):

This system has as-built plans.

Est. degree of accuracy of as-built plans (percent): 100%

This system uses an on-staff inspector(s) for construction projects.

Maintenance notes for this system:

RRWD will not take on any new projects until they have their finances in order and a full audit has been done.  After this they plan to address pressure problems.


	Date Last Modified: 06.10.2020

Include constructed projects in this list.

The following projects are associated with this system:

PNum	Applicant	Project Title	Project Status	Funding Status	Schedule (yrs)	Project Cost	Agreed Order	Dates Modified
PNum	Applicant	Project Title	Project Status	Funding Status	Schedule (yrs)	Project Cost	Agreed Order	Profile	GIS
WX21043028	Rattlesnake Ridge Water District	Rattlesnake Ridge Water District Phase 11 Water System Improvements	Under Construction	Partially Funded	0-2 Years	$3,894,003	N	12-09-2019	12-08-2017
WX21043047	Rattlesnake Ridge Water District	Phase 12 Water System Improvements	Approved	Fully Funded	0-2 Years	$5,042,500	N	05-22-2023	07-13-2020
WX21043050	Rattlesnake Ridge Water District	Miscellaneous Water Main Extensions	Approved	Not Funded	0-2 Years	$2,384,000	N	12-16-2024	12-12-2023
WX21043051	Rattlesnake Ridge Water District	Phase 14 Water Line Extensions	Approved	Not Funded	0-2 Years	$2,276,000	N	07-12-2023	07-12-2021
WX21043052	Rattlesnake Ridge Water District	RATTLESNAKE RIDGE GPS/GIS SYSTEM	Approved	Partially Funded	0-2 Years	$130,000	N	07-17-2023	08-23-2021
WX21043057	Rattlesnake Ridge Water District	Phase 13 - Water System Improvements	Approved	Not Funded	0-2 Years	$9,825,000	N	07-12-2023	12-12-2022
WX21043060	Rattlesnake Ridge Water District	Rattlesnake Ridge Lead Service Line Inventory/Survey	Approved	Not Funded	0-2 Years	$450,000	N	07-12-2023	12-12-2022
WX21043061	Rattlesnake Ridge Water District	Rattlesnake Ridge Creek Crossings	Approved	Not Funded	0-2 Years	$871,000	N	07-12-2023	12-12-2022
WX21043062	Rattlesnake Ridge Water District	Tank Upgrade for Carter County Schools	Approved	Not Funded	0-2 Years	$2,991,850	N	08-18-2025	08-18-2025
WX21043063	Grayson Utilities Commission	Grayson General Water System Improvements	Approved	Not Funded	0-2 Years	$4,000,000	N	12-18-2025
WX21063016	Elliott County Fiscal Court	Bruin Hill/409 Water Connection	Approved	Not Funded	0-2 Years	$162,800	N	01-26-2026	01-26-2026
WX21063017	Elliott County Fiscal Court	Elliott County Line Extensions	Approved	Not Funded	0-2 Years	$1,365,100	N	01-26-2026	01-26-2026

Direct viewing of map content is no longer available in this tab.

Click Here to view this map in a separate browser tab or window.