WRIS KY0100064

Downloadable Documents

Note:

Tariff documents apply to the owner entity of this system and may not reflect sales summarized in the Fiscal Attributes tab presented on this page.

Download PSC Audit Report Document

Download PSC Annual Report (UFR) Document

Download Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) for year

System Management Entity Information
Entity Name:	Cannonsburg Water District
Office Phone:	606∙928∙9808 Fax: 606∙928∙4788
Office Address 1:	1606 Cannonsburg Rd
Office Address 2:
Office City, State Zip:	Ashland , KY 41102

System Management Contact Information
Contact Type	Contact Name	Title	EMail
¹Operations Contact:	Tim Webb	Manager	tim@cannonsburgwater.com
²Business Contact:	Andrea McCoy	Office Manager	andrea@cannonsburgwater.com
Manager:	Tim Webb	Manager	tim@cannonsburgwater.com

¹ Person responsible for physical infrastructure operations.

² Person responsible for billing and financial operations.

Date System Management Last Modified: 06.03.2020

Entity Information
Entity Type:	Water District (KRS 74)
Entity Name:	Cannonsburg Water District
PSC Group ID:	19500
Office EMail:	tim@cannonsburg.com
Web URL:	https://cannonsburgwater.com/
Office Phone:	606-928-9808	Fax:	606-928-4788

Entity Address Information
	Mail Address	Physical Address
Address Line 1:	1606 Cannonsburg Rd
Address Line 2:
City, State Zip:	Ashland , KY 41102

Entity Contact Information
Contact Type	Name	Title	EMail	Phone	Cell
Business Contact:	Tim Webb	Manager	tim@cannonsburgwater.com	606-928-9808	606-232-6054
Authorized Official:	Robert McGuire	Chairman	tim@cannonsburgwater.com	606-928-9808

Information Source:	Kentucky Infrastructure Authority
Date Last Modified:	01.26.2024

System Statistics
Date Established:		09.01.1973
Employees:		12
Does this system:
(a)	Produce water?	No
(b)	Have wholesale customers?	Yes
(c)	Purchase water?	Yes
What is the cost per 4,000 gallons of finished water for:
(a)	Municipal system, customers within the municipality:
(b)	Municipal system, customers outside the municipality:
(c)	Non-municipal system, all customers:	$44.41
Date of Last Rate Adjustment:		05.13.2019

System Demographics

Demographic Type	Population	Households
Directly Serviceable:	8,919	3,812
Indirectly Serviceable:	13,499	6,084
Total Serviceable:	22,418	9,896

Counties directly serviceable by this system: 3

MHI Basis:

County Name	Service Connections	Serviceable Population	Serviceable Households	Med HH Income	MHI MOE
Boyd	3,422	8,423	3,589	$ 70,881	$ 9,440
Carter		26	10	$ 60,263	$ 27,772
Greenup	201	470	213	$ 53,043	$ 9,727
Totals / Weighted Average	3,623	8,919	3,812	$ 69,856	$ 9,504

Population and household counts are based on a proximity analysis of relevant service lines to census block boundaries published for the 2020 Census DEC Redistricting Data (PL 94-171) dataset.

Med HH Income (MHI) Source is from the American Community Survey 2018-2022 5 Yr Estimates (Table B19013) for the service area of this system.

MHI MOE = Med HH Income Margin of Error.

Date Last Modified: 07.26.2022

Providers that sell water to this system:

Seller DOW Permit ID	Seller Name	Water Type	Ann. Vol. (MG)	Cost		Interconnects
Seller DOW Permit ID	Seller Name	Water Type	Ann. Vol. (MG)	Raw	Fin	Perm	Seas	Emer
KY0100944	Big Sandy Water District	F	5.216		$4.85	3	0	0
KY0100011	City of Ashland	F	319.950		$2.73	7	0	0
	Totals and Weighted Averages		325.166		$2.76	10	0	0

Providers that purchase water from this system:

Purchaser DOW Permit ID	Purchaser Name	Water Type	Ann. Vol. (MG)	Cost		Interconnects			Serviceable
Purchaser DOW Permit ID	Purchaser Name	Water Type	Ann. Vol. (MG)	Raw	Fin	Perm	Seas	Emer	Population	Households	MHI
KY0100944	Big Sandy Water District	F			$4.06	1	0	0	13,499	6,084	$58,448
	Totals and Weighted Averages					1	0	0	13,499	6,084	$58,448

− MG = Million Gallons
− Water Types: R = Raw Water, F = Finished Water, B = Both Raw and Finished Water
− Cost Categories: Raw = Raw Untreated Water, Fin = Finished Treated Water
− Raw and Finished costs are per 1,000 gallons.
− Interconnect Types: Perm = Permanent, Seas = Seasonal, Emer = Emergency

Production Statistics:

	WRIS	SDWIS MOR
Total Annual Vol. Produced (MG):
Total Annual Vol. Purchased (MG):	325.166	354.847
Total Annual Vol. Provided (MG):	325.166	354.847
Estimated Annual Water Loss:	26%	32%

Customers and Usage:

Customer Type	Cust. Count	WRIS Usage (MG)	SDWIS MOR Usage (MG)
Wholesale:	1		0.337
Residential:	3,359	146.314
Commercial:	253	44.923
Institutional:	2	19.121
Industrial:	2	21.483
Other:	45	4.919
Total Customers:	3,662
Flushing, Maint. & Fire Protection:		4.624
Total Water Usage:		241.384

Water Supply Info and Comments:

Water supply inadequacies during normal operating conditions:

Not provided.

Water supply inadequacies during drought operating conditions:

Not provided.

Planning Comments:

None.

Date System Planning Info Last Modified: 07.26.2022

WMC Site Visit - Survey Information
Site Visit / Survey Date:	05.14.2022
Survey Admin:	Eric Patton
Principal Respondent:	Tim Webb
Other Respondent(s):

Survey Comments:

One previously removed interconnect is now being used again with a usage of 16 mgd.  This will have to be mapped and the values input for that connection before usage and water loss will be correct.

Date Survey Info Last Modified: 07.26.2022

Water
LinesWater
TanksPump
Stations

Assessment Area:

Size
(inches)

Material

Decade
Constructed

Length
(LF)

Condition
Code

Performance
Code

Priority
Code

Project Profile

3	AC	1980	2,622
3	PVC	1980	219,273
3	PVC	1990	1,139
3	PVC	2000	11,972
4	PVC	1980	15,739
4	PVC	2000	917
6	AC	1980	6,992
6	PVC	1980	83,041
6	PVC	1990	88
6	PVC	2000	19,354
8	AC	1980	24,739
8	PVC	1980	3,204
10	PVC	1980	6,726
12	AC	1980	16,872
12	CAST IRON	1980	4,863
12	PVC	1980	34

Total length for assessment area:	417,575 LF
Total length for entire system:	869,452 LF

Condition Codes

1	New or Excellent - None or minor defects.
2	Good - Defects that have not begun to deteriorate.
3	Fair - Moderate defects that will continue to deteriorate.
4	Poor - Severe defects that will collapse/break in near future.
5	Inoperable - Defects need immediate attention.

Performance Codes

1	Exceeds/Meets all performance targets.
2	Minor performance deficiencies.
3	Considerable performance deficiencies.
4	Major performance deficiencies.
5	Fails to meet performance targets.

Priority Codes

0	Not a priority
1	It would be nice to have.
2	Improved system operations & maintenance (O&M) efficiency.
3	Internal safety concern or public nuisance.
4	Potential public health, safety, or environmental concern.
5	Existing threat to public health, safety, or environment.

Assessment Area:

Asset Name

Capacity
(gal)

Date
Constructed

Date
Inspected

Condition
Code

Performance
Code

Priority
Code

Project Profile

BRIARWOOD	30,000	1/1/1983	1/1/2005
INDUSTRIAL PARK TANK	1,000,000	1/1/1985	1/1/1998
PRINCESS HILL TANK	300,000	1/1/1971	1/1/1998
TARPAN RIDGE TANK	50,000	1/1/1979	1/1/1998
TARPAN RIDGE TANK #2	141,000	1/1/1992	1/1/1998

Condition Codes

1	New or Excellent - None or minor defects.
2	Good - Defects that have not begun to deteriorate.
3	Fair - Moderate defects that will continue to deteriorate.
4	Poor - Severe defects that will collapse/break in near future.
5	Inoperable - Defects need immediate attention.

Performance Codes

1	Exceeds/Meets all performance targets.
2	Minor performance deficiencies.
3	Considerable performance deficiencies.
4	Major performance deficiencies.
5	Fails to meet performance targets.

Priority Codes

0	Not a priority
1	It would be nice to have.
2	Improved system operations & maintenance (O&M) efficiency.
3	Internal safety concern or public nuisance.
4	Potential public health, safety, or environmental concern.
5	Existing threat to public health, safety, or environment.

Assessment Area:

Asset Name

Pump
Count

Condition
Code

Performance
Code

Priority
Code

Project Profile

BRIARWOOD	2
BROOKFIELD FARMS	2
PAUL COFFEE	2
REBEL ROAD	2
ROCKDALE	2
TARPAN RIDGE	2

Condition Codes

1	New or Excellent - None or minor defects.
2	Good - Defects that have not begun to deteriorate.
3	Fair - Moderate defects that will continue to deteriorate.
4	Poor - Severe defects that will collapse/break in near future.
5	Inoperable - Defects need immediate attention.

Performance Codes

1	Exceeds/Meets all performance targets.
2	Minor performance deficiencies.
3	Considerable performance deficiencies.
4	Major performance deficiencies.
5	Fails to meet performance targets.

Priority Codes

0	Not a priority
1	It would be nice to have.
2	Improved system operations & maintenance (O&M) efficiency.
3	Internal safety concern or public nuisance.
4	Potential public health, safety, or environmental concern.
5	Existing threat to public health, safety, or environment.

The management of this system participates in an Area Water Management Planning Council (AWMPC).

The management of this system participates in regular training activities.

System operator(s) participate in regular training activities.

This system has an asset management plan.

Date asset management plan last updated:

05.01.2018

This system has a capital improvement plan.

Date capital improvement plan last updated:

05.01.2018

This system has GIS capabilities.

This system has a policy manual in place containing the following items:
Personnel Policies	Standard Operating Procedures
Line Maintenance Program	Meter Testing Program
Routine Pressure Checks	Pump Station Maintenance Schedule
Emergency Operation Procedures	Backup Sources of Water
A Water Shortage Plan	A Water Conservation Plan
Date policy manual last updated: 05.01.2007

Date of last DOW Sanitary Survey: Month: 11 , Year: 2012

This system has periodic service outages.

This system has periodic pump failures.

This system has periodic line breaks.

The following components are associated with periodic line breaks:
Typical line size(s):	6.00
Typical line location(s):	From home to meter
Typical cause(s):	Deterioration older aging pipes
Other cause(s):	None
Est. water loss percentage:	22%

This system has localized problems.

This system has as-built plans.

Est. degree of accuracy of as-built plans (percent): 1%

This system uses an on-staff inspector(s) for construction projects.

Maintenance notes for this system:

This system was established in 1966.  75% of the current system is 48 years old.
There will be a sanitary survey in 2015 but it is not yet scheduled.


	Date Last Modified: 06.12.2020

Include constructed projects in this list.

The following projects are associated with this system:

PNum	Applicant	Project Title	Project Status	Funding Status	Schedule (yrs)	Project Cost	Agreed Order	Dates Modified
PNum	Applicant	Project Title	Project Status	Funding Status	Schedule (yrs)	Project Cost	Agreed Order	Profile	GIS
WX21019057	Cannonsburg Water District	Phase II - Shoppes Road Water Line Replacement	Approved	Over Funded	0-2 Years	$2,814,600	N	07-12-2023	12-12-2022
WX21019058	City of Ashland	US 23 Winchester Avenue Water Main Replacement – Phase 1	Approved	Partially Funded	0-2 Years	$1,279,000	N	02-23-2024
WX21019059	Cannonsburg Water District	Phase II Water System Improvements	Approved	Not Funded	0-2 Years	$2,166,500	N	07-12-2023	07-12-2021
WX21019061	City of Ashland	Secondary Raw Water Line	Approved	Not Funded	3-5 Years	$1,200,000	N	07-12-2023
WX21019066	Cannonsburg Water District	Addington Road Line Extension	Approved	Fully Funded	0-2 Years	$250,000	N	07-12-2023	10-26-2022
WX21019068	Cannonsburg Water District	Midland Trail Line Replacement Phase 1	Approved	Not Funded	0-2 Years	$2,035,000	N	02-16-2024	12-12-2022
WX21019069	Cannonsburg Water District	Midland Trail Line Replacement Phase 2	Approved	Not Funded	0-2 Years	$2,011,000	N	12-05-2023	12-12-2022
WX21019070	Cannonsburg Water District	Rush Off-Road Line Extension Project	Approved	Not Funded	0-2 Years	$799,000	N	07-12-2023	12-12-2022
WX21019071	Cannonsburg Water District	Canonsburg Water Lead Line Study/Inventory	Approved	Not Funded	0-2 Years	$460,000	N	07-12-2023	12-12-2022

Direct viewing of map content is no longer available in this tab.

Click Here to view this map in a separate browser tab or window.