WRIS WX21165031

About Us

Loan Programs

Loan Calculator

WRIS

Internet Mapping

WRIS Portal

System Data

Project Profile Data

Cleaner Water Program Funding

SRF Project Funding

Area Water Management Planning Councils

Downloadable Reports

Water Management Coordinators

ADD GIS Staff

Legislation
& Regulations

WRIS Contact

Don Schierer
502-892-3486
E-mail

Working...

Drinking Water Project Profile:

This profile is currently locked (SRF Applicant).

View Map

Project Title:	Frenchburg Lead/Copper Line and Components Assessment
Project Number:	WX21165031	AWMPC:	GWADD
Funding Status:	Not Funded	Date Approved by AWMPC:	12.14.2022
Project Status:	Approved	Primary County:	Menifee
Project Schedule:	0-2 Years	Planning Unit:	Menifee
E-ClearingHouse SAI:		ECH Status:
Primary System:	KY0830148 City of Frenchburg	ADD WMC Contact:	Benjamin Hamm
Legal Applicant:	City of Frenchburg
Entity Type:	Incorporated City

Narrative
Applicant
AdministrationBudget
& Schedule
Impacts
ComponentsSustainable
Infrastructure
Audit
Map

Project Title:
Frenchburg Lead/Copper Line and Components Assessment

Project Description:
This project is for the City of Frenchburg to conduct a Lead Service Line inventory of all the public and private service lines in their water distribution system, as required by the revised EPA Lead and Copper Rule, to identify which lines, if any, are made of lead piping. Work shall include professional services to aid in review and summary of historic records, existing data and visual inspections on existing service lines as well as active/invasive investigations of existing service lines. Gateway Area Development District has created, in cooperation with Kentucky Rural Water Association, an ArcGIS Dashboard that will be utilized by the City of Frenchburg to review, update, and log the verification and location of Lead Service Lines and components. The City of Frenchburg can specify the method of verification of each service line and its location. The City can also identify the length of the line and any components that may also need to be replaced, such as goosenecks, within the created Dashboard. The data will be collected and processed through the ArcGIS Dashboard, which will be reviewed by Gateway Area Development District. Gateway Area Development District will then generate a Lead Service Line Inventory Assessment for each utility to submit to the Division of Water by the October 2024 Deadline. Upon completion of the LSL Inventory, the utility will identify projects as necessary to replace any identified lead and/or copper components in the system.

Need For Project: Briefly describe how this project promotes public health or achieves and/or maintains compliance with the Clean Water Act or Safe Drinking Water Act:
Conducting an inventory of lead service lines within the system will allow City of Frenchburg and the public to have information regarding lead piping and other components in the system for future, planned replacement of such piping and components.

Project Alternatives:

Alternate A:

Note: If project includes the construction of a new treatment plant or upgrade to existing plant, please explain regionalization options here.

Not applicable at this time.

Alternate B:

Entity Information
Entity Type:	Incorporated City
Entity Name:	City of Frenchburg
PSC Group ID:	8808800
Office EMail:	fburg@mrtc.com
Web URL:
Office Phone:	606-768-3457	Fax:	606-768-6277

Entity Address Information
	Mail Address	Physical Address
Address Line 1:	PO Box 113 28-B Bible Camp Lane
Address Line 2:
City, State Zip:	Frenchburg , KY 40322

Entity Contact Information
Contact Type	Name	Title	EMail	Phone	Cell
Business Contact:	Brandi Gross	City Clerk	fburg@mrtc.com	606-768-3457
Authorized Official:	Edward Bryant	Mayor	mayor@mrtc.com	606-768-3457

Information Source:	Kentucky Department for Local Government
Date Last Modified:	04.27.2024

Project Administrator (PA) Information

Name:	Ben Hamm
Title:	Associate Director of Economic Development
Organization:	Gateway Area Development District
EMail:	benjamin.hamm@ky.gov
Phone:	606-780-0090 Fax:
Address Line 1:	110 Lake Park Dr
Address Line 2:
City, State Zip:	Morehead , KY 40351

Applicant Contact (AC) Information

Name:	Edward Bryant
Title:	Mayor
Organization:	City of Frenchburg
EMail:	mayor@mrtc.com
Phone:	606-768-3457 Fax:
Address Line 1:	PO Box 113
Address Line 2:
City, State Zip:	Frenchburg , KY 40322

Project Engineer (PE) Information
This project requires a licensed Professional Engineer. A Professional Engineer has been procured for this project.

Estimated Budget As-Bid Budget

Project Cost Categories
Cost Category	Cost
Administrative Expenses:
Legal Expenses:
Land, Appraisals, Easements:
Relocation Expense & Payments:
Planning:	$30,000
Engineering Fees - Design:
Engineering Fees - Construction:
Engineering Fees - Inspection:
Engineering Fees - Other:
Construction:	$70,000
Equipment:
Miscellaneous:
Contingencies:
Total Project Cost:	$100,000

Construction Cost Categories
Cost Category	Cost
Treatment:
Transmission and Distribution:	$70,000
Lead Remediation:
Source:
Storage:
Purchase of Systems:
Restructuring:
Land Acquisition:
Non-Categorized :
Total Construction Cost:	$70,000

Total Sustainability Costs:	$70,000

Note:

Sustainability costs are included within other costs
reported in this tab. This breakout, when provided,
is for SRF review purposes.

Project Funding Sources

Total Project Cost:	$100,000
Total Committed Funding:
Funding Gap:	Not Funded

Funding Source	Loan or Grant ID	Fiscal Year	Amount	Status	Applicable Date
KIA SRF Fund F Loan (DW)	F24-021	2024	$100,000	Ranked	06-12-2023
KIA SRF Fund F Loan (DW) - Lead Service Lines	F24-021L	2024	$100,000	Ranked	06-12-2023
Total Committed

Funding Source Notes

Estimated Project Schedule

Estimated Environmental Review Submittal Date:
Estimated Bid Date:	07.01.2023
Estimated Construction Start Date:	10.01.2023
Estimated Construction Completion Date:	10.01.2024

The following systems are beneficiaries of this project:

	KY0830148	City of Frenchburg
	KY0060022	Bath County Water District
	KY1190061	Campton Water System

Checked box indicates primary system for this project.

Project Ranking by AWMPC:

Regional Ranking(s):
Planning Unit Ranking:
Total Points:

Plans and Specifications:

Plans and specs have been sent to DOW.

Plans and specs have been reviewed by DOW.

Plans and specs have been sent to PSC.

Plans and specs have been reviewed by PSC.

Economic Impacts
Jobs Created:
Jobs Retained:

MHI Basis:

Demographic Impacts (GIS Census Overlay)
Serviceable Demographic	Project Area	Included Systems	Included Utilities
Population:		5,230	5,230
Households:		2,976	2,976
MHI:		$43,567	*$43,567
MHI MOE:		$9,980	$9,980
MOE as Percent:		23%	23%
**NSRL:		2	2

Population and household counts are based on the 2020 Census DEC Redistricting Data (PL 94-171) dataset.

Median Household Income (MHI) Source: American Community Survey 2018-2022 5 Yr Estimates (Table B19013 *(for the primary system operated by the above listed beneficiary utilities).

MHI MOE = Med HH Income Margin of Error.

** NSRL (Non-Standard Rate Levels):
  0 = Greater than or equal to Kentucky MHI (KMHI).
  1 = Between 80% KMHI and KMHI (exclusive).
  2 = Less than or equal to 80% KMHI.
  - KMHI = $60,183
  - 80% KMHI = $48,146

New Customers
New Residential Customers:
New Commercial Customers:
New Institutional Customers:
New Industrial Customers:

New or Improved Service
Service Demographic	Survey Based	Census Overlay*
To Unserved Households:
To Underserved Households:	3,017
To Total Households:	3,017
**Cost Per Household:	$33

*	GIS Census block overlay figures are estimates of population and households potentially served by systems and projects based on a proximity analysis of relevant service lines to census block boundaries published for the 2010 SF1 dataset.
**	Cost per household is based on surveyed household counts, not GIS overlay values.

Geographic Impacts
For Project Area

Counties

Menifee

Legislative Districts

District Name	Legislator
House 074	David Hale
Senate 28	Greg Elkins
Congressional 5	Hal Rogers

HUC 10 Watersheds

HUC 10 Code	Watershed Name
0510010104	Beaver Creek

Geographic Impacts
For Included System(s)

Counties

Bath

Breathitt

Lee

Menifee

Montgomery

Morgan

Powell

Rowan

Wolfe

Legislative Districts

District Name
House 074	David Hale
House 084	Chris Fugate
House 089	Timmy Truett
House 091	Bill Wesley
House 099	Richard White
Senate 27	Stephen West
Senate 28	Greg Elkins
Senate 30	Brandon Smith
Congressional 5	Hal Rogers
Congressional 6	Andy Barr

DW Specific Impacts:

	This project relates to a public health emergency.
	This project will assist a non-compliant system to achieve compliance.
	This project will assist a compliant system to meet future requirements.
	This project will provide assistance not compliance related.
	This project is necessary to achieve full or partial compliance with a court order, agreed order, or a judicial or administrative consent decree.
	Primary system has not received any SDWA Notices of Violation within the previous state fiscal year (July through June).
	Primary system has had an action level exceedance (lead concentrations exceed an action level of 15 ppb in more than 10% of customer taps sampled) within the last compliance period.
	Primary system has received a lead trigger level exceedance (lead concentrations exceed a trigger level of 10 ppb in more than 10% of customer taps sampled) within the last compliance period.

Project Readiness LSL (Lead Inventory and Lead Service Line Replacement):

Lead Service Line Inventory:

	A description of goals to be achieved and products to be created (e.g., electronic or GIS database; customer communication tools) when creating a lead service line inventory procedure, including a proposed timeline for achieving each goal.
Download Supporting Document

Lead Service Line Replacement:

	A strategy for informing customers before a LSLR and a template for an agreement with the private property owner to replace the LSL.
	A process for documenting all property owners declining replacement of privately owned portion of LSL.
	A procedure for customers to flush service lines and premise plumbing of particulate lead.
	A proposed plan for conducting LSL replacement utilizing all requested funding.
	A funding strategy for conducting LSLRs utilizing all requested funding.

Project Inventory (Mapped Features):

Point Features:

DOW PermitID	Count	Feature Type	Purpose	Status	Existing Capacity	Proposed Capacity	Units
KY0830148	1	LSL	INVENTORY	NEW			EA

Administrative Components:

The following administrative components are included in this project:

Planning

Design

Construction

Management

Audits on Record
Associated With Applicant

Audit Year	Entity Name	Entity Relationship
2021	Frenchburg, City of	Parent
2020	Frenchburg, City of	Parent

Regionalization Components:

Public Water Systems Eliminated:

This project includes the elimination of public water system(s) through merger or acquisition.

Water Treatment Plants Eliminated:

This project includes the elimination of water treatment plant(s).

Supplementation of Raw Water Supply:

This project includes supplementing the existing raw water supply.

Supplementation of Potable Water Supply:

This project includes supplementing the existing potable water supply.

Emergency Only Water Supply:

This project provides emergency only water supply.

Water Source Protection:

	This project will preventatively address PFAS or other emerging contaminants of the source water.
	This project will address current PFAS or other emerging contaminants of the source water.
	This project includes the rehabilitation of a dam or reservoir used primarily for drinking water.
	This project includes land acquisition for water source protection.

Water Treatment Components:

This project includes water treatment components.

Water Distribution and Storage Components:

This project includes water distribution and/or storage components.

Green
InfrastructureWater
EfficiencyEnergy
EfficiencyEnvironmentally
InnovativeAsset
Management

Green Infrastructure:

Green stormwater infrastructure includes a wide array of practices at multiple scales that manage wet weather and that maintains and restores natural hydrology by infiltrating, evapotranspiring and harvesting and using stormwater. On a regional scale, green infrastructure is the preservation and restoration of natural landscape features, such as forests, floodplains, and wetlands, coupled with policies such as infill and redevelopment that reduce overall imperviousness in a watershed. On the local scale, green infrastructure consists of site and neighborhood-specific practices, such as:

Component		Cost
Item 1:	Bioretention
Item 2:	Trees
Item 3:	Green Roofs
Item 4:	Permeable Pavement
Item 5:	Cisterns
Total Cost:

* Indicates a business case may be required for this item.

If any box(es) above are checked, please describe each below.

Water Efficiency:

The use of improved technologies and practices to deliver equal or better services with less water. Water efficiency encompasses conservation and reuse efforts, as well as water loss reduction and prevention, to protect water resources for the future. Examples include:

Component		Cost
Item 1:	Installing or retrofitting water efficient devices such as plumbing fixtures and appliances (toilets, showerheads, urinals).
Item 2:	Installing any type of water meter in previously unmetered areas (can include backflow prevention if in conjunction with meter replacement).
Item 3:	Replacing existing broken/malfunctioning water meters with AMR or smart meters, meters with leak detection, backflow prevention.
Item 4:	Retrofitting/adding AMR capabilities or leak equipment to existing meters.
Item 5:	Conducting water utility audits, leak detection studies, and water use efficiency baseline studies, which are reasonably expected to result in a capital project or in a reduction in demand to alleviate the need for additional capital investment.
Item 6:	Developing conservation plans/programs reasonable expected to result in a water conserving capital project or in a reduction in demand to alleviate the need for capital investment.
Item 7:	Recycling and water reuse projects that replace potable sources with non-potable sources (Gray water, condensate, and wastewater effluent reuse systems, extra treatment or distribution costs associated with water reuse).
Item 8:	Retrofit or replacement of existing landscape irrigation systems to more efficient landscape irrigation systems.
Item 9:	Water meter replacement with traditional water meters.*
Item 10:	Distribution pipe replacement or rehabilitation to reduce water loss and prevent water main breaks.*
Item 11:	Storage tank replacement/rehabilitation to reduce water loss.*
Item 12:	New water efficient landscape irrigation system, where there currently is not one.*
Item 13:	Implementation of incentive programs to conserve water such as rebates.
Item 14:	Installing WaterSense labeled products (https://www.epa.gov/watersense)
Item 15:	Projects that result from a water efficiency related assessments (such as water audits, leak detection studies, conservation plans, etc.) as long as the assessments adhered to the standard industry practices referenced above.
Item 16:	Distribution system leak detection equipment, portable or permanent.
Item 17:	Automatic flushing systems (portable or permanent).
Item 18:	Pressure reducing valves (PRVs).
Item 19:	Internal plant water reuse (such as backwash water recycling).
Total Cost:

* Indicates a business case may be required for this item.

If any box(es) above are checked, please describe each below.

Energy Efficiency:

Energy efficiency is the use of improved technologies and practices to reduce the energy consumption of water projects, use energy in a more efficient way, and/or produce/utilize renewable energy. Examples include:

Component		Cost
Item 1:	Renewable energy projects, which are part of a public health project, such as wind, solar, geothermal, and micro-hydroelectric that provides power to a utility.
Item 2:	Utility-owned or publicly-owned renewable energy projects.
Item 3:	Utility energy management planning, including energy assessments, energy audits, optimization studies, and sub-metering of individual processes to determine high energy use areas.
Item 4:	Energy efficient retrofits, upgrades, or new pumping systems and treatment processes (including variable frequency drives (VFDs).*
Item 5:	Pump refurbishment to optimize pump efficiency.*
Item 6:	Projects that result from an energy efficient related assessment.*
Item 7:	Projects that cost effectively eliminate pumps or pumping stations.*
Item 8:	Projects that achieve the remaining increments of energy efficiency in a system that is already very efficient.*
Item 9:	Upgrade of lighting to energy efficient sources.*
Item 10:	Automated and remote control systems (SCADA) that achieve substantial energy savings.*
Total Cost:

* Indicates a business case may be required for this item.

If any box(es) above are checked, please describe each below.

Environmentally Innovative Projects:

Environmentally innovative projects include those that demonstrate new and/or innovative approaches to delivering services or managing water resources in a more sustainable way. Examples include:

Component		Cost
Item 1:	Total integrated water resources management planning, or other planning framework where project life cycle costs are minimized, which enables communities to adopt more efficient and cost-effective infrastructure solutions.
Item 2:	Plans to improve water quantity and quality associated with water system technical, financial, and managerial capacity.
Item 3:	Source water protection planning (delineation, monitoring, modeling).
Item 4:	Planning activities to prepare for adaptation to the long-term effects of climate change and/or extreme weather.
Item 5:	Utility sustainability plan consistent with EPA’s sustainability policy.
Item 6:	Greenhouse gas inventory or mitigation plan and submission of a GHG inventory to a registry as long as it is being done for an SRF eligible facility.
Item 7:	Construction of US Building Council LEED certified buildings, or renovation of an existing building.
Item 8:	Projects that significantly reduce or eliminate the use of chemicals in water treatment.*
Item 9:	Treatment technologies or approaches that significantly reduce the volume of residuals, minimize the generation of residuals, or lower the amount of chemicals in the residuals.*
Item 10:	Trenchless or low impact construction technology.*
Item 11:	Using recycled materials or re-using materials on-site.*
Item 12:	Educational activities and demonstration projects for water or energy efficiency (such as rain gardens).*
Item 13:	Projects that achieve the goals/objectives of utility asset management plans*	$70,000
Total Cost:		$70,000

* Indicates a business case may be required for this item.

If any box(es) above are checked, please describe each below.

Replacing lead and copper service lines/components within the system will bring the City of Frenchburg in compliance with EPA's Lead and Copper regulations, promoting public health and safety.

Asset Management:

If a category is selected, the applicant must provide supporting documentation in PDF format to substantiate claims.

Asset Management Components

Last Rate Adjustment Date:	02.01.2024 Download Fee Schedule
Rate Adjustment Age (months):	0

System’s monthly water bill, based on 4,000 gallons, as a percentage of MHI:

0.90%

The system has an Asset Management Plan (AMP).

The system(s) involved in this project have specifically allocated funds for the rehabilitation and replacement of aging and deteriorating infrastructure.

If any box(es) above are checked, please describe each below.

Activity	Date
Profile Created:	12.06.2022
Profile Last Modified:	04.06.2023
General Info Last Modified:	12.15.2022
Narrative Last Modified:	04.06.2023
Admin Info Last Modified:	12.06.2022
Budget Info Last Modified:	12.06.2022
Impacts Info Last Modified:	12.06.2022
Plans & Specs Info Last Modified:
Components Info Last Modified:	03.09.2023
GIS Last Modified:	03.08.2023

The profile is complete.

Direct viewing of map content is no longer available in this tab.

Click Here to view this map in a separate browser tab or window.